Categories
Politics

Rabidly Anti-gun Sotomayor is Unacceptable

Obama Picks Anti-gun Judge for the Supreme Court
— Time to start contacting your Senators right away

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

Friday, May 29, 2009

Unless you’ve taken a very long Memorial Day vacation, you’ve no doubt
heard the big news.

President Obama has picked an anti-gun radical to replace Justice David
Souter on the Supreme Court.

Obama’s pick is Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who is currently on the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Second District. There she has racked up an
anti-Second Amendment record and has displayed contempt for the rule of
law under the Constitution.

The Heller decision put the Supreme Court in support of the
Constitutional protection of the individual right to keep and bear arms.
Sotomayor, a politically correct lover of centralized government power
(as long as she is part of the power elite), immediately went into
counter-attack mode against the Heller decision.

Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which ruled
in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to the
states. As she and her cohorts claimed, the Supreme Court has not yet
incorporated the states under the Second Amendment. Until then, she
believes, the Second only applies to the District of Columbia.

This is pure judicial arrogance — something Sotomayor relishes (as long
as she is one of the ruling judges). In fact, protection of the right
to keep and bear arms was a major objective for enactment of the
Fourteenth Amendment, as recently freed slaves were being disarmed and
terrorized in their neighborhoods.

But Sotomayor disdains this important right of individuals, as indicated
by an earlier opinion from 2004. In United States v. Sanchez-Villar,
she stated that “the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental
right.”

Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s.
Fox Cable News reported yesterday that in her senior thesis at Princeton
University, she wrote that America has a “deadly obsession” with guns
and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
firearms ownership.

Sotomayor’s Second Amendment views go hand in hand with her politically
correct views on the law and the role of judges.

In a speech given at Duke University in 2005, she made it abundantly
clear that judges are involved in making policy. Realizing that this
did not sound very judicial (even though most judges act on this basis),
Sotomayor tried to laugh off her brazen admission: “I know this is on
tape and I should never say that, [audience laughing], because we don’t
make law — I know. Um, okay. I know, I’m not promoting it, I’m not
advocating it.” The audience continued to laugh. They got the joke.

But Sotomayor’s joke will be on us and our liberties if she gets
confirmed to the Supreme Court. And that is why we need to start
contacting our Senators early and often, urging them to vote against
this dangerous nomination.

ACTION: Please contact your two Senators and urge them to oppose the
nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court. You can
go to the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators the
pre-written e-mail message below.

—– Pre-written letter —–

Dear Senator:

If you cherish the Second Amendment and agree that it protects an
individual right to keep and bear arms — as stated by the recent Heller
decision — then you must vote against Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

This choice for the Supreme Court is totally unacceptable! Consider a
partial rendering of her anti-gun record:

  • Sotomayor ruled in United States v. Sanchez-Villar (2004) that “the
    right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right.”
  • Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which
    ruled in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to
    the states. This makes her more liberal than the Ninth Circuit, which
    stated in April that the Second Amendment does apply to the states.
  • Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s.
    Fox Cable News reported on May 28 that in her senior thesis at Princeton
    University, she wrote that America has a “deadly obsession” with guns
    and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
    firearms ownership.

I will consider a vote in favor of Sotomayor as the most anti-gun vote a
Senator could cast. To send an anti-gun liberal judge to the Supreme
Court for the rest of her life is to establish “legislation without
representation.” After all, she says that the courts are where policy
is made, and once she’s there, we’ll never be able to vote her out.

Again, please vote against this dangerous nomination.

Sincerely,


“Live Fire” radio with Larry Pratt is broadcast by the Information
Radio Network on Saturdays at 12:00 Noon Eastern. “Live Fire” is
simulcast on the web at http://inforadionet.com and previous episodes
are archived at http://irnusaradio.com/our-programs/live-fire with a
number of listening formats, including podcasts, supported.

Recent guests, among many others, have included:

  • Charl van Wyk — Gun Control in Africa
  • GOA’s Mike Hammond — Socialized Medicine and Gun Control
  • Dave Hardy — Ranchers, Illegal Immigrants, and Guns

Please do not reply directly to this message, as your reply will
bounce back as undeliverable.

To subscribe to free, low-volume GOA alerts, go to
http://www.gunowners.org/ean.htm on the web. Change of e-mail
address may also be made at that location.

To unsubscribe send a message to
gunowners_list@capwiz.mailmanager.net with the word unsubscribe in
the subject line.

Problems, questions or comments? The main GOA e-mail address
goamail@gunowners.org is at your disposal. Please do not add that
address to distribution lists sending more than ten messages per
week or lists associated with issues other than gun rights.



Bookmark and Share

Bookmark and Share


Categories
Politics

Tell Obama: Stop The Spending!

I have just signed the “Stop The Spending” petition which opposes
the Obama budget with $1.6 trillion in new taxes, an oppressive
carbon tax and unprecedented deficits for years to come.

Petitions will be delivered soon to Congress — and a vote
is expected within days. Please go here to join me in signing:

http://www.grassfire.org/112/petition.asp?PID=20625078&NID=1

Scott



Bookmark and Share

Bookmark and Share


Categories
Politics

FW: CITGO CHANGING ITS NAME IMPORTANT NEWS! BEWARE.

IN ORLANDO LAST WEEK, AT A CITGO STATION, REGULAR GAS WAS PRICED AT $1.95 PER GALLON, AND NO CUSTOMERS.
, HOWEVER ACROSS THE STREET FUEL WAS SELLING FOR $2.05 PER GALLON AND ALL PUMPS THERE HAD CARS WAITING FOR FUEL make sure you read this very carefully.

NEWS FLASH:
Chavez is NOW getting a Russian Weapons Factory built by Putin. The RUSSIANS are building an AK -47 Kalashnikov Assault Rifle factory in Venezuela , to give armament support to Communist Rebel groups throughout the Americas .

Chavez NOW has IRANIANS operating his oil refineries in Venezuela for him. It is likely only a matter of time, if not already, before Chavez has Iranian built LONG RANGE missiles, with a variety of warhead types aimed at: Guess Who?

CITGO PETRO EXPRESS” due to the loss of gasoline sales in the USA …due to the recent publicity of ownership by Chavez of Venezuela.

Every dollar you spend with ”CITGO” or PETRO EXPRESS” gasoline will be used against you, your basic human rights, and your freedoms. He will start wars here in the Americas that will probably be the death of millions. NOT BUY FROM “PETRO EXPRESS” EITHER!!! ‘PETRO EXPRESS’ IS ALSO 100% OWNED BY “CHAVEZ.”

KEEP THIS MEMO GOING SO THAT EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT IS HAPPENING.
BOTTOM LINE,– BOYCOTT “CITGO” &” please!!

PLEASE MAKE SURE THIS IS PASSED ON TO EVERYONE IN YOUR E-MAIL LIST IN THE UNITED STATES AND OUTSIDE OF AMERICA ..



Bookmark and Share

Bookmark and Share


Categories
Climate Change Politics

GE’s incestuous relationship with Obama

Everyone needs to boycott GE!

GE owns majority share of NBC UNIVERSAL “Formed in May 2004 through the combining of NBC and Vivendi Universal Entertainment, NBC Universal owns and operates a valuable portfolio of news and entertainment networks, a premier motion picture company, significant television production operations, a leading television stations group, and world-renowned theme parks. NBC Universal is 80% owned by General Electric and 20% owned by Vivendi.” NBC UNIVERSAL TELEVISION GROUP is NBC, MSNBC and Telemundo, NBC News also includes “NBC Mobile provides news and information updates and show excerpts to cell phone users throughout the day reported by the anchors and correspondents of NBC News, and NBC News Radio produces up-to-the-minute radio reports for affiliated stations in all major markets across the country.”

NBC Owns and Operates TV Stations in major cities all over the country;
WNBC (NBC4 New York), KNBC (NBC4 Los Angeles), WMAQ (NBC5 Chicago), WCAU (NBC10 Philadelphia), KNTV (NBC3 San Jose/San Fransisco),
KXAS (NBC5 Dallas/Fort Worth), WRC (NBC4 Washington), WTVJ (NBC6 Miami), KNSD (NBC7/39 San Diego), WVIT (NBC30 Hartford),

GE though their holdings in NBC promoted the election of Obama. It has come to my attention (Glenn Beck) that not only is GE a major producer of CFL (Compact florescent Light bulbs), but they also are the major producer of wind turbines and have a major stake in “Carbon Credits”. If Obama pass all his Green Energy and Cap and Trade plans GE will stand to make billions.

Obama is quoted as saying on Earth day “He pushed personal responsibility, calling on every American to replace one incandescent light bulb with one compact fluorescent. The president also said the leaders of the world’s major economies will meet next week to discuss the energy crisis.”

For his remarks, Obama chose Iowa, second only to Texas in installed wind capacity.

He announced his administration is creating the nation’s first program to authorize offshore projects to generate electricity from wind turbines and ocean currents. The Interior Department on Wednesday issued the long-awaited regulations governing how leases will be issued for the development of such energy sources and how revenue will be shared with coastal states.”

Obama talks up wind power, green jobs on Earth Day

Obama advisers express support for Democrats energy bill

Will General Electric Get Paid for Supporting President Obama?   The O’Reilly Factor   talking points.

GE CEO Jeffrey Immelt says Obama’s stimulus plan will work

The chief executive of General Electric Co Jeffrey Immel is on Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, meant to provide outside-the-Beltway input to the president!!!!

GE, NBC & Obama Ties

GE Reports   Obama spotlights GE wind partners on Earth Day



Bookmark and Share

Bookmark and Share


Categories
Politics

Napolitano must go!

I just signed a petition demanding the resignation or removal
of DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano. Napolitano’s Department of
Homeland Security issued a report that profiled conservatives
as a terror threat. The report even singled out pro-life
citizens and those who oppose illegal immigration, in
addition to members of the military.

Please join with me in signing by going here:

http://www.grassfire.org/114/petition.asp?PID=20730918&NID=1

See the Report PDF

She has also embarrassed our country while visiting Canada recently, saying the 9/11 terrorist came from there when they didn’t. She sucks on border issues and She sucked as the Arizona governor and we are thrilled she is gone but not before she bankrupted the state.. She only has a job because she supported Obama over our state Senator McCain. She isn’t qualified to be dog catcher and certainly isn’t qualified to be head of our National Security. She is as leftist as Obama is but she is way dumber.. She MUST GO!!

Fire Janet Napolitano!

Remember if any one or more of the following applies, YOU could be branded a terrorist or extremist and
subject to “scrutiny” by federal, state and local police if:
You believe in the 2nd Amendment
You believe in the right to life
You believe in the right to free speech
You are a veteran who honorably served your country
You believe in the right to peaceably assemble
You desire that your government not waste YOUR money
You believe you pay enough taxes already
You are a returning member of the military who risked your life for your country
You desire the laws of our land be ENFORCED and our BORDERS SECURED!
You are of the Jewish or Christian faith and believe the government should protect against radical Islamic fundamentalists who desire to kill you and other Americans
You believe those who violate the law should NOT be rewarded with YOUR tax dollars

Scott



Bookmark and Share

Bookmark and Share


Categories
Politics

Gird Your Blogs!

Got this from World Net Daily the other day.

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: WorldNetDaily

Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:40 AM
Subject: The Internet’s Greatest Threat
To: Scott

A Free Press For A Free People
Gird Your Blogs!
Under “Cybersecurity”, Congress Will Be the Internet’s Greatest Threat!

By Brad O’Leary

Gird your blogs, because if liberals in Congress get their way,
President Obama will have sole discretionary authority to shut down
the Internet or critical parts of the Internet should he feel his
presidency is being tested. Worse, under the guise of cybersecurity,
Obama will essentially be granted the power to destroy free speech on
the web.

On April 1st of this year, Senators Rockefeller, Snowe, Bayh and
Nelson introduced bills S. 773 and S.778, collectively called the
Cybersecurity Act, which would give President Obama dictatorial power
over the Internet during a time of national crisis or emergency.

All of the bills’ sponsors voted for the Bipartisan Campaign Reform
Act of 2002 that prohibited organizations and individuals from running
advocacy ads against candidates 60 days in advance of a general
election. Now it seems these same people have conjured up a gag order
for the Internet.

According to the current drafts, under the Cyber Security Act of 2009
the President may “declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the
limitation or shut down of Internet traffic to and from any comprised
federal government or United States critical infrastructure
information system or network”. He may also “order the disconnection
of any Federal Government or United States critical infrastructure
information systems or networks in the interest of national security.”

What constitutes “cybersecurity emergency” or “critical infrastructure
information system or network” is left completely up to the President
to define. We know that the Administration, according to Rahm Emanuel,
never wants “a serious crisis to go to waste”. We also know the
Administration supports the regulation of free speech on the Internet.

President Obama’s choice to lead the powerful Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs is none other than Cass Sunstein, a radical
Harvard law professor and supporter of the Fairness Doctrine for the
Internet. According to Sunstein, “A system of limitless individual
choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the
interest of citizenship and self-government.”

Obama campaign fundraiser and FCC Chair nominee, Julius Genachowski,
is a supporter of “Net neutrality”, the first step in applying the
Fairness Doctrine to the Internet.

“Net neutrality” proponents like Genachowski would have government
decide what content Internet operators and network owners must
provide. Incredibly, they claim this is to keep the Internet free and
open to all, when in reality, their goal is to usher the heavy hands
of federal regulators into the tent.

Stifling any venue where ideology competes with left-wing mainstream
media has always been a goal of the left and Obama. Obama has just
been more evasive in his means by supporting policies such as “net
neutrality” and wobbling on the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine
to talk radio. Liberal members of Congress are now set on sending
America on an unconstitutional b-line away from Uncle Sam and directly
to Big Brother.

The Cybersecurity Act is also includes a provision where “The
Department of Commerce shall serve as the clearinghouse of
cybersecuirty threat and vulnerability information to the Federal
Government and private sector owned (emphasis mine) critical
infrastructure information systems and networks.” Shelving all privacy
laws including the requirement for warrants, the Secretary of Commerce
“shall have access to all relevant data concerning such networks
without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule or policy
restricting such access.” Senator Rockefeller made it clear in his
statement what “relevant data” this act could include when he stated
“We must protect our critical infrastructure at all costs ­ from our
water to our electricity, to banking, traffic lights and electronic
health records ­ the list goes on.”

While we have worried about cyber attacks from Russia and China, who
would have thought the greatest threat would come from members of our
own Congress.

More by This Author
Shut Up, America!
The End of Free Speech

By Brad O’Leary

In Shut Up, America! The End of Free Speech, Brad O’Leary shines light
on a dark mission of the left, shutting down conservative voices ­
and, in the process, eviscerating the First Amendment.

Brad O’Leary exposes the agenda and the strategy behind the plan —
how Congress and the president will rationalize the changes using the
language of “diversity” and “fairness” and “tolerance.” He also
addresses how the impending legislation and regulations will doubly
impact Christian talk radio — and eventually every other form of
communication in America.

While supplies last, every copy of Shut Up, America! purchased from
WorldNetDaily will be autographed by Brad O’Leary!

Get Your Signed Copy of “Shut Up, America!” Now

“If you want to see the blueprint for the plot to silence talk radio,
this is it,” says Joseph Farah, founder of WorldNetDaily and WND
Books. “How important is this? If you want to see the people in charge in Washington remain there perpetually, ignore this threat. The plot to end free speech and the free press in America is the ultimate incumbent protection plan.”

About the Author:

Brad O’Leary is chairman of PM Direct Marketing and a former NBC
Westwood One talk-show host. He is the author of 11 books, including
last year’s bestseller, The Audacity of Deceit: Barack Obama’s War on
American Values.

WorldNetDaily | 2020 Pennsylvania Ave NW, #351 | Washington, DC 20006

Copyright 1997-2009
WorldNetDaily.com Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Bookmark and Share

@newsalerts.worldnetdaily.com>

Bookmark and Share


Categories
Climate Change

Global Warming & Earth day

One of my favorite sites to visit every day ticked me off last night

Astronomy Picture of the Day 4/21/09 was about global warming and they said:
“How much will the Earth’s surface warm up over the lives of our children? No one is sure. Compared to the past 100 million years, the Earth is currently enduring a relative cold spell, possibly about four degrees Celsius below average. Over the past 100 years, however, data indicate the average global temperature of the Earth has increased by nearly one degree Celsius.”

Lets analyze this sentence which is written by two Astrophysicis (since when was climate their area of expertise?). First it states Earth is currently experiencing a cold spell compared to the last 100 mission years. Also you should know we have been cooling the last few years and have experienced very cold winter. Here in Phoenix we’ve had freezing temperatures in December when we normally don’t freeze at all. Two winters ago we had a record cold snap for a few days that froze and killed trees, plants all over the valley and froze plumbing all over.

Next they tell us we are having global warming because the average had increased by “nearly 1 degree Celsius” which is 9/5ths of a Fahrenheit degree, or 1 degree Celsius = 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit. So the average over the last 100 years has gone up less than 2 degrees Fahrenheit.

To convert from Celsius to Fahrenheit, first multiply by 180/100, then add 32
To convert from Fahrenheit to Celsius, first subtract 32, then multiply by 100/180

What they haven’t told you is we have only had accurate records about that long and how accurate they are is debatable. Or that there are 31,478 American scientists who have signed the Global Warming Petition Project which states they are “convinced that the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity and that government action on the basis of this hypothesis would unnecessarily and counter productively damage both human prosperity and the natural environment of the Earth.” They have a 12 page article on why Global warming isn’t science.. (html 150-dpi PDF, 300-dpi PDF, or 600-dpi PDF)


“ABSTRACT

A review of the research literature concerning the environmental consequences of increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide leads to the conclusion that increases during the 20th and early 21st centuries have produced no deleterious effects upon Earth’s weather and climate. Increased carbon dioxide has, however, markedly increased plant growth. Predictions of harmful climatic effects due to future increases in hydrocarbon use and minor greenhouse gases like CO2 do not conform to current experimental knowledge. The environmental effects of rapid expansion of the nuclear and hydrocarbon energy industries are discussed.”

Or that the a good number of the stations that provide the data aren’t properly sited and give very bad readings.

Ponder the Maunder
Climate Audit.org
Pain in Maine, but they can measure rain
How not to measure temperature, part 22
Surface Stations, Climate Stations records and Surveys

Harmful Man Induced Climate Change Refuted
The Global Warming Hoax
Global Climate Scam

The Global warming scare isn’t about “saving the planet or mankind” It is about power, money and control over YOU. The people who are pushing it are either dupes of the people pushing it or the ones who are making the money on it and want power and control. GE which owns NBC through them other media outlets is the biggest producer of CFL lights and lobbied congress to ban regular light bulbs. Gore who is a hypocrite and sells carbon credits. There are many others but I don’t have time to research them.

Temperatures dropping, fewer hurricanes, arctic ice growing, polar bear population up -WorldnetDaily

Scott’s World Home page
Scott’s Weather Station
Scott’s Weather Underground Member page


Scott’s website
Scott Blog


Bookmark and Share

Bookmark and Share


Categories
Politics RKBA

Obama Pushing Treaty To Ban Reloading

Obama Pushing Treaty To Ban Reloading
— Even BB guns could be on the chopping block

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Remember CANDIDATE Barack Obama? The guy who “wasn’t going to take away
our guns”?

Well, guess what?

Less than 100 days into his administration, he’s never met a gun he
didn’t hate.

A week ago, Obama went to Mexico, whined about the United States, and
bemoaned (before the whole world) the fact that he didn’t have the
political power to take away our semi-automatics. Nevertheless, that
didn’t keep him from pushing additional restrictions on American gun
owners.

It’s called the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing
of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives, and Other
Related Materials. To be sure, this imponderable title masks a really
nasty piece of work.

First of all, when the treaty purports to ban the “illicit” manufacture
of firearms, what does that mean?

  1. “Illicit manufacturing” of firearms is defined as “assembly of
    firearms [or] ammunition… without a license….”

Hence, reloading ammunition — or putting together a lawful firearm from
a kit — is clearly “illicit manufacturing.”

Modifying a firearm in any way would surely be “illicit manufacturing.”
And, while it would be a stretch, assembling a firearm after cleaning it
could, in any plain reading of the words, come within the screwy
definition of “illicit manufacturing.”

  1. “Firearm” has a similarly questionable definition.

“[A]ny other weapon” is a “firearm,” according to the treaty — and the
term “weapon” is nowhere defined.

So, is a BB gun a “firearm”? Probably.

A toy gun? Possibly.

A pistol grip or firing pin? Probably. And who knows what else.

If these provisions (and others) become the law of the land, the Obama
administration could have a heyday in enforcing them. Consider some of
the other provisions in the treaty:

  • Banning Reloading. In Article IV of the treaty, countries commit to
    adopting “necessary legislative or other measures” to criminalize
    illicit manufacturing and trafficking in firearms.

Remember that “illicit manufacturing” includes reloading and modifying
or assembling a firearm in any way. This would mean that the Obama
administration could promulgate regulations banning reloading on the
basis of this treaty — just as it is currently circumventing Congress
to write legislation taxing greenhouse gases.

  • Banning Gun Clubs. Article IV goes on to state that the criminalized
    acts should include “association or conspiracy” in connection with said
    offenses — which is arguably a term broad enough to allow, by
    regulation, the criminalization of entire pro-gun organizations or gun
    clubs, based on the facilities which they provide their membership.
  • Extraditing US Gun Dealers. Article V requires each party to “adopt
    such measures as may be necessary to establish its jurisdiction over the
    offenses it has established in accordance with this Convention” under a
    variety of circumstances.

We know that Mexico is blaming U.S. gun dealers for the fact that its
streets are flowing with blood. And we know it is possible for Mexico
to define offenses “committed in its territory” in a very broad way.
And we know that we have an extradition obligation under Article XIX of
the proposed treaty. So we know that Mexico could try to use the treaty
to demand to extradition of American gun dealers.

Under Article XXIX, if Mexico demands the extradition of a lawful
American gun dealer, the U.S. would be required to resolve the dispute
through “other means of peaceful settlement.”

Does anyone want to risk twenty years in a sweltering Mexican jail on
the proposition that the Obama administration would apply this provision
in a pro-gun manner?

  • Microstamping. Article VI requires “appropriate markings” on
    firearms. And, it is not inconceivable that this provision could be
    used to require microstamping of firearms and/or ammunition — a
    requirement which is clearly intended to impose specifications which are
    not technologically possible or which are possible only at a
    prohibitively expensive cost.
  • Gun Registration. Article XI requires the maintenance of any records,
    for a “reasonable time,” that the government determines to be necessary
    to trace firearms. This provision would almost certainly repeal
    portions of McClure-Volkmer and could arguably be used to require a
    national registry or database.

  • ACTION: Write your Senators and urge them to oppose the Inter-American
    Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms,
    Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials.

    Please use the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
    http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators the
    pre-written e-mail message below.

    —– Pre-written letter —–

    Dear Senator:

    I am urging you, in the strongest terms, to oppose the Inter-American
    Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms,
    Ammunition, Explosives, and Other Related Materials.

    This anti-gun treaty was written by international bureaucrats who are
    either stupid or virulently anti-gun — or both.

    This treaty could very well ban the ability to reload ammunition, to put
    new stocks on rifles lawfully owned by American citizens, and, possibly,
    even ban BB guns!

    There are too many problems with this treaty to mention them all in this
    letter. The rest can be read on the website of Gun Owners of America
    at:
    http://www.gunowners.org/fs0901.htm

    Please do not tell me the treaty has not yet been abused in this way by
    the bevy of Third World countries which have signed it. We do not
    expect the real ramifications of the treaty to become clear until the
    big prize — the U.S. — has stepped into the trap.

    For all of these reasons, I must insist that you oppose ratification of
    the treaty.

    Sincerely,


    What’s Your Current GOA Status?

    Obviously, we now face years of invigorated attacks on our gun rights.
    Shutting down gun shows, prohibitions on specific calibers, another
    semi-auto ban, and the anti-gun extremists’ Holy Grail of mandatory
    federal licensing and registration of all gun owners — these are just
    some of the horrors that we already know we’ll have to defeat head-on.
    Not to mention this treaty nonsense. Meanwhile, we’ll take every
    opportunity to go on offense and advance the Second Amendment.

    It can’t be done without every single voice being counted. That’s why
    we are asking you to consider making the commitment of becoming a Gun
    Owners of America Life Member. By doing so, you put the politicians on
    notice that neither you nor GOA is going away — that no matter who’s in
    the White House, there is always going to be a solid wall of resistance.

    Now is a perfect time to become a Life Member. And if you aren’t a GOA
    member at all, isn’t it time you became one?

    Please go to http://gunowners.org/ordergoamem.htm to upgrade your
    participation in GOA.


    Please do not reply directly to this message, as your reply will
    bounce back as undeliverable.

    To subscribe to free, low-volume GOA alerts, go to
    http://www.gunowners.org/ean.htm on the web. Change of e-mail
    address may also be made at that location.

    To unsubscribe send a message to
    gunowners_list@capwiz.mailmanager.net with the word unsubscribe in
    the subject line or use the url below.

    Problems, questions or comments? The main GOA e-mail address
    goamail@gunowners.org is at your disposal. Please do not add that
    address to distribution lists sending more than ten messages per
    week or lists associated with issues other than gun rights.



    Bookmark and Share

    Bookmark and Share


    Categories
    RKBA

    Watch this CNN anti-gun YouTube video and SAF’s rebutal

    Watch this CNN anti-gun YouTube video and SAF’s rebutal

    Watch the YouTube link below to see CNN anti-gun rights bias and my on air knock out punch to them.

    YouTube – CNN Rick Sanchez ‘SLAMS’ FOX News’s Gun Fear Mongering with guest Alan Gottlieb of the Second Amendment Foundation.

    With your help we can make this the most watched video on YouTube.

    Thanks for all your help and support in protecting our right to keep and bear arms.

    Sincerely yours,

    Alan M. Gottlieb
    Founder, Second Amendment Foundation


    < Please e-mail, distribute, and circulate to friends and family >

    Copyright © 2009 Second Amendment Foundation, All Rights Reserved.

    Second Amendment Foundation
    James Madison Building
    12500 N.E. Tenth Place
    Bellevue, WA 98005 Voice: 425-454-7012
    Toll Free: 800-426-4302
    FAX: 425-451-3959
    email: InformationRequest@saf.org



    Bookmark and Share

    Bookmark and Share


    Categories
    Immigration

    Millions of Illegal Aliens to Get Amnesty!

    Vote Below:

    Keep ‘Dream Act’ Amnesty Dead

    or

    I FAVOR Illegal
    Alien Amnesties
      

    Help Us Keep the “Dream Act” Dead

    Sen. Durbin Brings Back His Disastrous ‘Dream Act’!

    Millions of Illegal Aliens to Get Amnesty!

    Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) has once again BROUGHT BACK his dreadful ‘Dream Act’ to amnesty illegal aliens under the age of 35 who have been in the country for the last five years!

    The ‘Dream Act’ would allow this group of illegal aliens to receive citizenship and be eligible for in-state tuition rates at public universities. This disastrous proposal will also make illegal aliens eligible for federal student loans and federal work-study programs, another benefit that any law-abiding foreign and U.S.-born students cannot receive ALL AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE.

    Why would Sen. Durbin reintroduce a policy that has already been shunned by Congress and America?

    VOTE IN OUR INSTANT POLL
    STOP New Illegal Alien Amnesty
    or

    I FAVOR Illegal
    Alien Amnesties

    (When you Click Your Answer above, you’ll be taken to a web page
    where you will see INSTANT RESULTS. You will also be able to take action if you wish.)

    Join with 900,220 citizens who make their voices heard through
    NumbersUSA, America’s largest-member immigration-reduction organization.
    We are non-profit and non-partisan.

    Numbers USA
    1601 N. Kent Street
    Suite 1100
    Arlington, VA 22209



    Bookmark and Share

    Bookmark and Share